Comparison

This comparison table helps you understand how oRPC differs from other popular TypeScript RPC and REST solutions.

• ✅ First-class, built-in support
• 🟡 Lacks features, or requires third-party integrations
• 🛑 Not supported or not documented

Feature	oRPC docs	oRPC	tRPC	ts-rest
End-to-end Typesafe Input/Output		✅	✅	✅
End-to-end Typesafe Errors	1, 2	✅	🟡	✅
End-to-end Typesafe File/Blob	1	✅	🟡	🛑
End-to-end Typesafe Streaming	1	✅	✅	🛑
Tanstack Query Integration (React)	1	✅	✅	🟡
Tanstack Query Integration (Vue)	1	✅	🛑	🟡
Tanstack Query Integration (Solid)	1	✅	🛑	🟡
Tanstack Query Integration (Svelte)	1	✅	🛑	🛑
Vue Pinia Colada Integration	1	✅	🛑	🛑
With Contract-First Approach	1	✅	🛑	✅
Without Contract-First Approach		✅	✅	🛑
OpenAPI Support	1	✅	🟡	🟡
OpenAPI Support for multiple schema	1	✅	🛑	🛑
OpenAPI Bracket Notation Support	1	✅	🛑	🛑
Server Actions Support	1	✅	✅	🛑
Lazy Router	1	✅	✅	🛑
Native Types (Date, URL, Set, Maps, ...)	1	✅	🟡	🛑
Streaming response (SSE)	1	✅	✅	🛑
Standard Schema (Zod, Valibot, ArkType, ...)		✅	✅	🛑
Built-in Plugins (CORS, CSRF, Retry, ...)		✅	🛑	🛑
Batch Request/Response	1	✅	✅	🛑
WebSockets	1	✅	✅	🛑
Nest.js integration		🛑	🟡	✅